Advertisement

News

Food & Water Watch and other organizations sue US Secretary of Commerce and Agencies on Offshore Aquaculture Plan

FWW said industrial facilities can produce lower-quality fish for consumers, undercut local fishermen’s prices for their catch, and pollute surrounding waters
October 8, 2009

Food & Water Watch and other organizations sue US Secretary of Commerce and Agencies on Offshore Aquaculture Plan

Food & Water Watch (FWW), in conjunction with several other organizations, filed suit against the Secretary of Commerce, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), over a plan to allow offshore industrial fish farming in the Gulf of Mexico. Food & Water Watch, a national consumer advocacy organization, sued because the plan and the process by which it was developed and enacted violates existing federal laws. The group, which has opposed the plan throughout its development, asserts, among other issues, that these entities did not take required actions in allowing the plan to be finalized, and do not have the authority to permit ocean aquaculture.
 
FWW says in a press release that the plan would allow what are essentially factory farms of the sea in federal waters of the Gulf of Mexico (mostly between three and 200 miles from shore, except off Texas and West Florida, where federal waters begin at about nine miles). They claim these industrial facilities can produce lower-quality fish for consumers, undercut local fishermen’s prices for their catch, and pollute surrounding waters.
 
“These massive operations primarily benefit private corporations and can harm consumers, coastal communities and the environment,” said Food & Water Watch Executive Director Wenonah Hauter.
 
“Development of the first ocean fish farms in U.S. federal waters is not a matter to be taken lightly – or to simply be allowed to happen without detailed agency review and decision-making,” said Marianne Cufone, Esq., Food & Water Watch Fish Program director. “Rather than taking a stand, the agencies chose to stay silent, allowing the illegal plan to simply become effective.”
 
Food & Water Watch Staff Attorney Zach Corrigan explained, “The process by which the plan was pushed through was unfair and wholly inappropriate.”
 
Under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the entities involved have the authority to regulate fish and fishing—but setting up a permit system for ocean aquaculture facilities is far outside their jurisdiction, FWW claims.

Job Oportunities